Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC, No. 629, 2014 (Del. 2015)

Ross Aronstam & Moritz, together with Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, represented KKR Financial Holdings LLC and its directors in stockholder litigation challenging an approximately $2.6 billion merger with KKR & Co. LP.  The Court of Chancery granted the defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice.  On appeal, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed, rejecting plaintiffs' theory that a less-than-1% stockholder could be a controller by virtue of contractual rights and holding that the business judgment rule is the appropriate standard of review for a post-closing damages action when a merger that is not subject to the entire fairness standard of review has been approved by a fully informed, uncoerced majority of the disinterested stockholders.

Read the Court of Chancery's Opinion

Read the Supreme Court's Opinion

亚洲综合日韩在线2019_亚洲综合色区另类aⅴ_一本到高清视频免费观看